<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google BluffRank -  PR Downgrade a bluff?</title>
	<link>http://noelbautista.com/blog/google-bluffrank-pr-downgrade-a-bluff/</link>
	<description>From Tech stuff to paranormal to internet marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: SharkMan &#187; Google BluffRank - PR Downgrade a bluff?</title>
		<link>http://noelbautista.com/blog/google-bluffrank-pr-downgrade-a-bluff/#comment-15393</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noelbautista.com/blog/google-bluffrank-pr-downgrade-a-bluff/#comment-15393</guid>
					<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt[IMG 8035661.jpg] The first pagerank downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Hiroshima”) was for those sites involved with selling links which are mostly using Text Link Ads. A lot of sites get a 1 to 3 PR downgrades, however, in my tests and others also noticed it, the search engine ranking and traffic are not affected. The second pr downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Nagasaki”) was for sites that are selling sponsored posts such as posts for Pay Per Post (PPP). This time, the PR were set [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt[IMG 8035661.jpg] The first pagerank downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Hiroshima”) was for those sites involved with selling links which are mostly using Text Link Ads. A lot of sites get a 1 to 3 PR downgrades, however, in my tests and others also noticed it, the search engine ranking and traffic are not affected. The second pr downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Nagasaki”) was for sites that are selling sponsored posts such as posts for Pay Per Post (PPP). This time, the PR were set [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blogging Business Live, everything about markets! &#187; Google BluffRank - PR Downgrade a bluff?</title>
		<link>http://noelbautista.com/blog/google-bluffrank-pr-downgrade-a-bluff/#comment-15392</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://noelbautista.com/blog/google-bluffrank-pr-downgrade-a-bluff/#comment-15392</guid>
					<description>[...] MakeUseOf.com &#124; Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt[IMG 8035661.jpg] The first pagerank downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Hiroshima”) was for those sites involved with selling links which are mostly using Text Link Ads. A lot of sites get a 1 to 3 PR downgrades, however, in my tests and others also noticed it, the search engine ranking and traffic are not affected. The second pr downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Nagasaki”) was for sites that are selling sponsored posts such as posts for Pay Per Post (PPP). This time, the PR were set [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] MakeUseOf.com | Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt[IMG 8035661.jpg] The first pagerank downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Hiroshima”) was for those sites involved with selling links which are mostly using Text Link Ads. A lot of sites get a 1 to 3 PR downgrades, however, in my tests and others also noticed it, the search engine ranking and traffic are not affected. The second pr downgrade (let me call it Google’s PR “Nagasaki”) was for sites that are selling sponsored posts such as posts for Pay Per Post (PPP). This time, the PR were set [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
